________________ _____ ___
Sitting in the Unicorn Cafe in Evanston yesterday
as they played There is a Light Which Never Goes Out
by The Smiths, I suddenly found I had stopped
thinking about what I had come there to think about
and instead was wondering if this were true? Is there
really a light which never goes out?
I came to the conclusion, yes, take consolation, it
must be true. Of course if there is a God who has
given us the little light we enjoy for a short time
here, then the source of unquenchable light is obvious.
But even if we take it on faith there is no God,
the light that exists now came from somewhere,
or from some nothing perhaps, and even if this
expression of the light (this universe, these multiverses)
are someday extinquished, still the light will be
waiting to flicker on again at least as a possibility
already realized once.
The older I get the more practical Nietzche's idea of
Eternal Return seems. Eventually everything
must happen again - and again after that of course,
ad infinitum - unless there is a God strong enough
to bring closure to the whole! The girl I kissed in
the woods in high school, I will someday kiss again.
And again after that ...
Kundera thought it depressing that we repeat the
same mistakes forever, but the recurrence of this life
doesn't mean we don't also enjoy subtle variations,
perhaps marrying that girl and enjoying years of
wedded bliss over and over again in a parallel current
of eternal return.
In my play UNDER THE BIG BLUE MOON, a young
lady asks her aunt if she believes people can ever come
back from the dead.
--Yes, the aunt replies, because when a person is created
a whole host of possibilities is created for her life.
Sometimes God brings someone back to live out one
of the neglected possibilities.
The Aunt ends thecact by asking,
That makes sense, my dear, doesn't it?
+
Thursday, July 8, 2010
Saturday, July 3, 2010
Fourth of July, Many Happy Returns of the Day
--
Before CHICAGO, City of on the Make, there was
William Stead's If Christ Came to Chicago.
Published in 1894 it remains an incredibly good
read. It holds one fascinated at how violent and
shameless American culture once was.
Around that time, 2 people a day were killed on
average in Chicago in cable car accidents.
Newspaper boys in the first decade of the
Twentieth Century were routinely beat up for
delivering the wrong paper. 27 News Stand
Operators were killed for selling the wrong
paper by 1913.
People lived with a degree of risk we
would never accept today. I wonder if
anything has limited America's potential
as much as our aversion to risk.
Fear keeps us from imagining a form of
success really worth achieving. Sharing
drinks with one of Chicago's best writers,
Tom Geoghegan at the Twin Anchors last
Thursday as an early Fourth of
July Celebration, he traced our woes as a
nation to one simple cause:
Chicago, the Midwest, has let America down,
producing nothing the rest of the world wanted
anymore, surviving on corn syrup sold to
mainly ourselves.
Before CHICAGO, City of on the Make, there was
William Stead's If Christ Came to Chicago.
Published in 1894 it remains an incredibly good
read. It holds one fascinated at how violent and
shameless American culture once was.
Around that time, 2 people a day were killed on
average in Chicago in cable car accidents.
Newspaper boys in the first decade of the
Twentieth Century were routinely beat up for
delivering the wrong paper. 27 News Stand
Operators were killed for selling the wrong
paper by 1913.
People lived with a degree of risk we
would never accept today. I wonder if
anything has limited America's potential
as much as our aversion to risk.
Fear keeps us from imagining a form of
success really worth achieving. Sharing
drinks with one of Chicago's best writers,
Tom Geoghegan at the Twin Anchors last
Thursday as an early Fourth of
July Celebration, he traced our woes as a
nation to one simple cause:
Chicago, the Midwest, has let America down,
producing nothing the rest of the world wanted
anymore, surviving on corn syrup sold to
mainly ourselves.
Tuesday, June 29, 2010
Haymarket & Collective Memory
... only a lonely shaft remembers....
---------------------------------------Nelson Algren
Reading Richard Lindberg's illuminating and very lively book,
Chicago by Gaslight, I can't help but being amazed at how
radical the lower middle class - to use an anachronistic term -
once was in America. In 1879, a labor meeting in Chicago
could draw over 30,000 people to commemorate the
Paris Communards.
But where are these people in our memory?
Certainly the descendents of these 30,000 - and of the
100,000s there must have have been nationally - still walk the
streets of the nation, or I should say drive the streets of our
subdivisions. But how many of these descendants have any
idea that their own great grandfathers went to rallies and
cheered the speakers exhorting them to destroy capitalism?
How many Presbyterians, even in Chicago, know that the rising tensions
in Chicago which led to the Haymarket Riots are intimately tied with the
founding of the McCormick Theological Seminary?
When Cyrus Hall McCormick, son of the inventor of eponymous reaper,
took over the McCormick Reaper Works on his father's death*, he cut
the pay of his workers while simultaneously giving huge amounts of money
to Chicago's Presbyterian Seminary. Most of his workers were Catholic
and of course there is no love lost between these two tribes, so the tension
rose to levels which proved to be lethal when his workers learned of
the large bequest and compared it to their own penury.
My guess is that, today at least, most of the sympathy of those at
the McCormick Theological Seminary, both students and faculty
members, would lie with the workers, not the owner.
But of course ministers and professors, churches and universities need
money too, so it's McCormick for whom the Presbyterian Church names
its most important seminary and not Albert Parsons who returned
voluntarily to Chicago to be crucified; and it's not Robert
Sengstacke Abbott who founded the Chicago Defender
whose name graces the School of Journalism at Northwestern
University, but that of Joseph Medill, who once wrote an editorial in
his Chicago Tribune advocating the poisoning of homeless men,
" [as] a warning to other tramps to keep out of the neighborhood...."
In effect the rich buy a good memory of themselves, and we as
Americans, as people of faith, as those who in the end, alas,
believe in success as much as we believe in anything, accept this.
Nelson Algren sums it up in Chicago, City on the Make: our
institutions - that is the expressions of our common identity
and purpose, in the arts, in matters of faith, in education
- in the end they all serve as "Mere monuments to the luckier
brokers of the past."
__________________________ +
---------------------------------------Nelson Algren
Reading Richard Lindberg's illuminating and very lively book,
Chicago by Gaslight, I can't help but being amazed at how
radical the lower middle class - to use an anachronistic term -
once was in America. In 1879, a labor meeting in Chicago
could draw over 30,000 people to commemorate the
Paris Communards.
But where are these people in our memory?
Certainly the descendents of these 30,000 - and of the
100,000s there must have have been nationally - still walk the
streets of the nation, or I should say drive the streets of our
subdivisions. But how many of these descendants have any
idea that their own great grandfathers went to rallies and
cheered the speakers exhorting them to destroy capitalism?
How many Presbyterians, even in Chicago, know that the rising tensions
in Chicago which led to the Haymarket Riots are intimately tied with the
founding of the McCormick Theological Seminary?
When Cyrus Hall McCormick, son of the inventor of eponymous reaper,
took over the McCormick Reaper Works on his father's death*, he cut
the pay of his workers while simultaneously giving huge amounts of money
to Chicago's Presbyterian Seminary. Most of his workers were Catholic
and of course there is no love lost between these two tribes, so the tension
rose to levels which proved to be lethal when his workers learned of
the large bequest and compared it to their own penury.
My guess is that, today at least, most of the sympathy of those at
the McCormick Theological Seminary, both students and faculty
members, would lie with the workers, not the owner.
But of course ministers and professors, churches and universities need
money too, so it's McCormick for whom the Presbyterian Church names
its most important seminary and not Albert Parsons who returned
voluntarily to Chicago to be crucified; and it's not Robert
Sengstacke Abbott who founded the Chicago Defender
whose name graces the School of Journalism at Northwestern
University, but that of Joseph Medill, who once wrote an editorial in
his Chicago Tribune advocating the poisoning of homeless men,
" [as] a warning to other tramps to keep out of the neighborhood...."
In effect the rich buy a good memory of themselves, and we as
Americans, as people of faith, as those who in the end, alas,
believe in success as much as we believe in anything, accept this.
Nelson Algren sums it up in Chicago, City on the Make: our
institutions - that is the expressions of our common identity
and purpose, in the arts, in matters of faith, in education
- in the end they all serve as "Mere monuments to the luckier
brokers of the past."
* It should not be thought his father had significantly better relations
with workers. The elder McCormick financed
the acquisition of gatling machine guns for the Illinois National Guard
in case they had to protect him from... his own workers.
__________________________ +
Thursday, June 24, 2010
Berlusconi & The World Cup
________________________ ____
Doesn't the quick exit of Italy from the World Cup
feel like the inevitable result of Berlusconi's
premiership?
It's as if the petulant laziness of mind that the Italian people
have shown in the way they've let Berlusconi co-opt everything
expressed itself in the mediocrity the world champions have
become.
Italy hasn't had this much trouble in Africa since they
took on Ethiopia in 1935.
Doesn't the quick exit of Italy from the World Cup
feel like the inevitable result of Berlusconi's
premiership?
It's as if the petulant laziness of mind that the Italian people
have shown in the way they've let Berlusconi co-opt everything
expressed itself in the mediocrity the world champions have
become.
Italy hasn't had this much trouble in Africa since they
took on Ethiopia in 1935.
Labels:
2010 World Cup,
Berlusconi,
Ethiopia,
Italy,
Mediocrity
Monday, June 21, 2010
The New Dylan, The Old Springsteen
•
Looking on-line for an appropriate sound track to CHRONICLES,
Bob Dylan's memoirs, I came across this cover by Bruce Springsteen
of one of Dylan's greatest songs:
I Want You.
It's an amazing version, both awkward and heart-breakingly beautiful.
It's from Before Born to Run, a period of his career where Springsteen was
known as the New Bob Dylan, but this version is not the version of younger
man. The younger singer stole a back page from older and aged the song.
While the great original version expresses the frustration of the young
and self-assured at being unable to extend his feeling of power as far
as the object of his desire, in Springsteen's version the vocal is
secondary to a haunting high-pitched drone which feels like nothing
less than the accumulation of loss that we are forced to carry around
as we grow older.
The cover goes off the rail a bit - also sounding quite like
I Came For You, itself a song of young potency - when he sings
about fathers and true love and not thinking about it, because otherwise
he's singing from that period of life when you hold onto the most painful
love the hardest, fearing that when the pain is gone, it'll be all over
for you and love. And in your numbness you'll feel yourself
living that much closer to death.
Looking on-line for an appropriate sound track to CHRONICLES,
Bob Dylan's memoirs, I came across this cover by Bruce Springsteen
of one of Dylan's greatest songs:
I Want You.
It's an amazing version, both awkward and heart-breakingly beautiful.
It's from Before Born to Run, a period of his career where Springsteen was
known as the New Bob Dylan, but this version is not the version of younger
man. The younger singer stole a back page from older and aged the song.
While the great original version expresses the frustration of the young
and self-assured at being unable to extend his feeling of power as far
as the object of his desire, in Springsteen's version the vocal is
secondary to a haunting high-pitched drone which feels like nothing
less than the accumulation of loss that we are forced to carry around
as we grow older.
The cover goes off the rail a bit - also sounding quite like
I Came For You, itself a song of young potency - when he sings
about fathers and true love and not thinking about it, because otherwise
he's singing from that period of life when you hold onto the most painful
love the hardest, fearing that when the pain is gone, it'll be all over
for you and love. And in your numbness you'll feel yourself
living that much closer to death.
Labels:
Bob Dylan,
I Want You,
Main Point Club,
Philadelphia,
Springsteen
Thursday, June 17, 2010
Artists in Chicago
____________________
The artist working in Chicago's in the same situation as the
man married to his high school sweetheart: not only is she
less glamorous and beautiful than the women he met in college, but
also she doesn't treat him very well.
• • •
The artist working in Chicago's in the same situation as the
man married to his high school sweetheart: not only is she
less glamorous and beautiful than the women he met in college, but
also she doesn't treat him very well.
• • •
Wednesday, June 9, 2010
Landon School, Latin & Virtue
In the light of the multitude of scandals that have hit Landon School from the SAT cheating that took place in the years after 9-11 to the recent drafting of the girls as sex objects by the school's privileged boys, it's interesting to look at the Landon's School motto, Virtute Et Non Vi, which they translate as "By Virtue, not by Force."
The Latin root here, though, really means manly, as you can see in that it also shows up in the related word virility, and the association with goodness comes from an earlier age when manliness was considered a good in and of itself, i.e., a time such as in the Middle Ages when the privileged young males considered fighting and procreating - and, notably lacking at Landon, chivalry towards women - as the marks of a good knight, knights being the ultimate privileged young males.
The irony of the motto's root meaning, given the unchivalrous treatment of the female students and the tragic death of one of the Virginia Female Lacrosse player at the hands of a Landon lacrosse playing alum seems completely lost on the Landon School's administration as a look at their website makes clear.
Landon School
The word Character is posted over the picture of a Lacrosse Player. It's hard to imagine a more archetypical image of white male privilege. (Full disclosure: I played lacrosse at a public high school in Northern Virginia, not far from Landon before attending Yale College.) It is as if the Duke of Wellington came back from that Great Eton Playing Field in the Sky to affirm athletic prowess as the ultimate test of a boy's character. Of course the Battle of Waterloo may have been won on the playing fields of Eton, but the athletes on the playing fields of Eton are not headed for the battle fields of Afghanistan.
Perhaps given that the boys of Landon are now better known for cheating on the SATs and drafting local girls as sexual playmates, it's time for the administration to seek a new motto, one less redolent of virility. How do you translate, By your fruits you shall be known into Latin.
The Latin root here, though, really means manly, as you can see in that it also shows up in the related word virility, and the association with goodness comes from an earlier age when manliness was considered a good in and of itself, i.e., a time such as in the Middle Ages when the privileged young males considered fighting and procreating - and, notably lacking at Landon, chivalry towards women - as the marks of a good knight, knights being the ultimate privileged young males.
The irony of the motto's root meaning, given the unchivalrous treatment of the female students and the tragic death of one of the Virginia Female Lacrosse player at the hands of a Landon lacrosse playing alum seems completely lost on the Landon School's administration as a look at their website makes clear.
Landon School
The word Character is posted over the picture of a Lacrosse Player. It's hard to imagine a more archetypical image of white male privilege. (Full disclosure: I played lacrosse at a public high school in Northern Virginia, not far from Landon before attending Yale College.) It is as if the Duke of Wellington came back from that Great Eton Playing Field in the Sky to affirm athletic prowess as the ultimate test of a boy's character. Of course the Battle of Waterloo may have been won on the playing fields of Eton, but the athletes on the playing fields of Eton are not headed for the battle fields of Afghanistan.
Perhaps given that the boys of Landon are now better known for cheating on the SATs and drafting local girls as sexual playmates, it's time for the administration to seek a new motto, one less redolent of virility. How do you translate, By your fruits you shall be known into Latin.
Labels:
Landon School,
Latin,
male privilege,
Virtute et Non Vi
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)